![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Icon sizes: 256x256, 48x48, 32x32, 24x24, 16x16, 512x512 File formats: ICO, GIF, PNG, BMP ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Tags: icon xpm, icons dissapear and reappear, a little icon on, web icon sets, customize iconsAbout everything that is interfaced to it. The problem remains in the same place where it was fiveYears back. About it I can be limited only to repetition of that Wrote then: it about volume of the capital trusted the separate To the businessman, and the decision interfaced to it on the size of separate firm under Decisions on the most preferable are the control of one person actually Combinations of resources. And on the central power the decision will lie, Whether it is necessary to expand one factory possessed in any place, instead of other, Possessed somewhere else. All it assumes planning from outside The central power almost in the same scale, as though it actually Operated this enterprise. Though, most likely, the individual The businessman will receive any certain contract authorities on To management of the factory entrusted to it, all new investments will inevitably To be regulated on-line. Such division at the command of resources Simply would have then a consequence that neither the businessman, nor central The power really would be not to carry out in a condition planning and that would be It is impossible to define responsibility for errors. To assume that is possible To create conditions of a complete competitiveness, without forcing those who are responsible for acceptance Decisions to pay for the errors - the cleanest illusion. At the best it Will be quasicompetitiveness system where really responsible person will be not The businessman, and the officer approving its decision and where therefore in connection with All those will arise displays of the initiative and responsibility definition Planning, p. 237; see above]. The question, how much socialist system can avoid the expanded Centralised direction economic activities, it is extremely important and Besides its communication with economic efficiency. From it first of all Depends, how many personal and a political freedom it is possible to save in the such To system. Both authors convincingly show that understand dangers to the personal ![]()
| Copyright © 2009-2022 Aha-Soft. All rights reserved. |
|