 |
|
 | |
 | |
 | |
 | |
 | |
 | |
|
 | ||||||||
|
 |
 |
|
 Red Car Icon |
|
Add Red Car icon to cartIcon sizes: 256x256, 48x48, 32x32, 24x24, 16x16, 512x512
File formats: ICO, GIF, PNG, BMP
Purchase entire Large Home Icons now! View Large Home Icons now!
Download demo icons
Tags: red icon pack, twilight icons and quotes, accuflex icon v 3, high definition icon, online noe icon
Illustrations of the problems which are put forward by any theoretical science about company. ItCritical efforts are directed against a sight that the theory can be constructed
By clearing of historical experience, and its main assertion, now more Extended than when he has stated it for the first time, that logic
Theoretical assertions does not depend on any concrete experience. It is possible
To imagine that it would not began to deny that applicability of the theory to
To concrete circumstances depends on availability or absence of the facts, which
Can be certified only experience. And if the persevering assertion
Aprioristic character of the theory it seems at times to more unilateral, than it would be desirable
To the author it is necessary to remember that somewhat the abstract description
Structural relations, characteristic for mathematics and logic, always deductively
And it; can be empirically checked up only following kind Assertions - in the given circumstances to us there can be a such Structure. So that at the attentive analysis distinction between sights Professors Mizesa and modern "gipotetiko-deductive" interpretation
Theoretical science (as it has been formulated, for example, by Charles Popper in
1935 it is transferred as Logic
of Scientific Discovery (London: Hutchinson, Karl Popper, 1959; the processed editions in 1968, 1972 - it. It., 1935), zur Erkenntnistheotie der
modernen Naturwissenschaft (Vienna: J. Springer and Logik der Forschung), it is rather insignificant, thus, that both these
The approach are separated by a wide precipice from long time of the dominating naive
Empiricism. [Mizes, perhaps, also would disagree with such assertion. In 1962 he wrote that Popper's sights, being quite suitable for Natural sciences, "in no way cannot be applied to problems of sciences about
Activity of the person ". Statements of Mizesa about Popper look in Mises, The
Ultimate Foundation of Economic Sciense (Princeton, N.J.: D. Van Nostrand,
1962; the repeated edition: Kansas City, Mo.: Sheed Andrews and McMeel, 1978),
Copyright © 2009-2022 Aha-Soft. All rights reserved.
|
More info
