![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Icon sizes: 256x256, 128x128, 48x48, 32x32, 24x24, 16x16 File formats: ICO, GIF, PNG, BMP ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Tags: free construction icons, 16 x 16 icon, emo heart icons, bussy icons, lifehouse livejournal iconsIf you meet a situation in which the fee is high, but also the risk is great, but for any mad reason decide to neglect it and to continue the task then consult with the lawyer. In other words, buy a part of its time and in detail explain all facts, having given the task to write to the contract as much as possible reducing your risk on execution of responsibility.It is good, if you remember that there are not less high fees which are not accompanied by high risk, connected with responsibility execution. Try to make so that risky offers have avoided you. We live during strange time when it seems that everything to that us learnt in adolescence as if «becomes on a head». It is especially obvious in modern legal system (or as it actually it is necessary to name, system «the judges who are not possessing prudence»). Let's consider a real case. The citizen And has lost the control over the car. It ran into a pay phone in which there Would be a citizen. As a result last has been hospitalised. The lawyer of the citizen Would show to the insurance company of the citizen And the usual claim. It also has sued the telephone company that it has placed a box in a wrong place. The claimant has won both cases! Other example. The 29-year-old doctor with very sick heart (that was known to it) tried to get rebellious it a mower, having pulled 32 times getting cord. After that he has died. Its family lawyer has submitted the claim against a network of retail shops where the mower has been bought, demanding damage compensation for loss of incomes which the young doctor for many years could earn lives (though and with weak heart). Jurymen have awarded the claimant with the requested huge sum. In days of old, that the respondent has lost case on charge in professional incompetence, the claimant should prove its awareness on an error and its intended assumption. Now all not so. The motive any more has no value in such affairs. The best intentions of the professional in what are not put. You never reflected, as lawyers win proceeding about the negligent treatment started against hospital or the surgeon in spite of the fact that the patient signs in advance the legal refusal releasing them from any responsibility, promising that under no circumstances will not show them the claim. And patients win similar affairs. Advisers cannot even try to provide themselves with such protection. To any adviser who would try to ask similar refusal for the prospective client, would show the door. ![]()
| Copyright © 2009-2022 Aha-Soft. All rights reserved. |
|