 |
|
 | |
 | |
 | |
 | |
 | |
 | |
|
 | ||||||||
|
 |
 |
|
 Delete Icon |
|
Add Delete icon to cartIcon sizes: 256x256, 48x48, 32x32, 24x24, 20x20, 16x16
File formats: ICO, GIF, PNG, BMP
Purchase entire Large Toolbar Icons now! View Large Toolbar Icons now!
Download demo icons
Tags: dock folder icons, funny harry potter icons, monokuro boo icons, delete icon from desktop, world icons
Already more than hundred years co-operative societies apply for an alternative roleThe capitalist property on the enterprises. For those to whom not to liking as
Capitalism, and excesses of a real socialism, as well as for those who
Simply tired from a work and capital antagonism, co-operative societies are represented
Way out. Before the First World War in Germany and in the Scandinavian
The most probable way by a socialism.
If we are right, considering that freedom of formation of the new enterprises is
It is necessary to answer historically and logically interesting question: why,
Despite ease of formation of co-operative societies, overwhelming majority
The enterprises belong to investors? Almost everywhere co-operative societies receive
Government grants or in the direct form, or in the form of tax privileges; Pension and trade-union funds possess significant capitals, which Can be used for creation of co-operative societies. Why the co-operative The organisation form is not used much more widely, than now?
Answers to these questions are various for big and small enterprises. For the big
The enterprises the plausible explanation consists that the belonging To public of corporation, with easily sold and purchased shares, have more
Cheap access to the capital and more effectively is supervised by the organizational
Costs, than the enterprises in which the share in the property can belong Only to the employee, the manager, the supplier or the consumer. Besides, Property right attachment to the status of the consumer, the supplier or The employee far not to each will seem in the ideal method of maintenance Strategic flexibility and distribution of risks. For small enterprises Prevalence of cases when the property belongs to the investor, can be It is explained it by ease of formation of the enterprises belonging
To the investor-manager-founder, in comparison with a situation when it is necessary
To supply sharing of group of employees, suppliers or consumers. A little Further we will more in detail consider these moments. In terms of the theory of the organisation the enterprise or firm generally Represent the relation between managers, managers of the capital, Employees, consumers and suppliers. [Consideration is based upon model Firm Barnarda-Sajmona developed for a situation, described in work James G.
Copyright © 2009-2022 Aha-Soft. All rights reserved.
|
More info
