 |
|
 | |
 | |
 | |
 | |
 | |
 | |
|
 | ||||||||
|
 |
 |
|
 Factory with Shadow Icon |
|
Add Factory with Shadow icon to cartIcon sizes: 48x48, 32x32, 24x24, 20x20, 16x16, 256x256, 512x512
File formats: ICO, GIF, PNG, BMP
Purchase entire Large Commerce Icons now! View Large Commerce Icons now!
Download demo icons
Tags: icon collage graphics, get cool icons, icons drawings, desktop icons disappear then reappear, hate my life icons
The conflict between capitalism and a socialism in struggle terms for distributionThe income. Why to proprietary classes not to be more compliant? Why To them not to grant surplus of the incomes in favour of poor workers? Why
They resist to government intentions to lift a share made destitute for the account
Establishments of a minimum wages and ceiling for a rise in prices? Why It not to cut down the profits and percent to more "fair" level?
Compliance in this points in question, is told by these people, will weaken items of the radical
Revolutionaries will be saved also by capitalism. The worst enemies of capitalism, from their point
Sight, those unshakable doctrinaires, which the redundant care are
About preservation of economic freedom, system Laissez-faire and Manchesterstva
Break all attempts of achievement of the compromise with work requests.
generated
Representatives of so-called Manchester school. Its founders - English economists, salary regulations as from outside the states, factory Legislations, the politician, government grants of the industry, J. - (1811 - 1889), - supported complete economic freedom Commodity producers, Manchesterstvo - a direction in an economic science, with
The parties of trade-union associations., R.Kobden's politicians (1804 - 1865) and against any state interference in Enterprise activity. The Manchester school combated against Protectionism only staunch reactionaries are guilty in
Bitterness of modern party conflicts and in relentless hatred generated by them.
That is necessary on the grandfather so it to accept the constructive program instead of pure
Negativist principles of economic monarchists. And, certainly, from their point
Sight, the state interference is constructive"only.
However, such method of a reasoning is absolutely vicious. It is supposed that
Interference of the government in an economic life will lead to the expected good
Futility of the purposes of state regulation and about its inevitable and Undesirable consequences. A question not in that, are fair or not rates Minimum wages, but - whether they will lead to unemployment occurrence Among those who it to work. Naming these measures fair, interventionists Do not deny objection of economists. They simply show the complete Ignorance in this question.
Copyright © 2009-2022 Aha-Soft. All rights reserved.
|
More info
